Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 141-155 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X8200100204

Conversational Exchange Analysis

Andrew P. Thomas

University of York

Peter Bull

University of York

Derek Roger

University of York

In recognition of the deficiencies of the speech classification systems available for the analysis of informal conversation, the present article is concerned with the development, and subsequent description of a comprehensive speech analysis system. Developed from a review of the literature and the analysis of tape-recordings and transcripts, Conversational Exchange Analysis (CEA) comprises four sets of rules for the division and subsequent classification of speech. Initially segmenting conversational speech into units representing individual ideas, CEA is then used to classify speech along three separate dimensions representing how information is made salient in the conversation (Activity), the sort of information exchanged (Type), and the referent of the utterance (Focus). Measures of inter-observer agreement, using Cohen's (1960) kappa (Activity, kappa = 0.969 (p<0.001); Type, kappa = 0.957 (p<0.001); Subject focus, kappa = 0.994 (p<0.001); Object focus, kappa = 0.981 (p<0.001) ), indicate a high degree of reliability for category assignment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?