This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Noller, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Gender and Emotional Communication in Marriage

Different Cultures or Differential Social Power?

University of Queensland

This article focuses on the issue of whether gender differences in responses to emotional situations involving high levels of marital conflict can best be explained in terms of a deficit in either male or female functioning, males and females being socialized into different cultures, or the differential social power assigned to males and females. These different conceptualizations of gender differences are examined, and relevant research findings are presented. The issue is then discussed with particular reference to the demand-withdraw pattern in marriage, and the question is raised whether males withdraw from marital conflict primarily because they have difficulty dealing with conflict and the accompanying physiological arousal, because they have been socialized to resist pressure from others and to maintain independence, or because withdrawing is the best way of exerting power. The article concludes that the withdrawal behavior adopted by men during high levels of marital conflict does appear to enable them to maintain power in the relationship but that more work is needed before the different ways that men and women deal with conflict are fully understood.

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 1-2, 132-152 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X93121008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. R. Burleson, M. Liu, Y. Liu, and S. T. Mortenson Chinese Evaluations of Emotional Support Skills, Goals, and Behaviors: An Assessment of Gender-related Similarities and Differences Communication Research, February 1, 2006; 33(1): 38 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. Fergus, R. E. Gray, M. I. Fitch, M. Labrecque, and C. Phillips Active Consideration: Conceptualizing Patient-Provided Support for Spouse Caregivers in the Context of Prostate Cancer Qual Health Res, April 1, 2002; 12(4): 492 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. PETRONIO, N. ELLEMERS, H. GILES, and C. GALLOIS (Mis)communicating Across Boundaries: Interpersonal and Intergroup Considerations Communication Research, December 1, 1998; 25(6): 571 - 595. [Abstract]

				A. MULAC, K. T. ERLANDSON, W. J. FARRAR, J. S. HALLETT, J. L. MOLLOY, and M. E. PRESCOTT "Uh-huh. What's That All About?": Differing Interpretations of Conversational Backchannels and Questions as Sources of Miscommunication Across Gender Boundaries Communication Research, December 1, 1998; 25(6): 641 - 668. [Abstract]

				R. Edwards The Effects of Gender, Gender Role, and Values on the Interpretation of Messages Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1998; 17(1): 52 - 71. [Abstract]

				M. Willemyns, C. Gallois, V. J. Callan, and J. Pittam Accent Accommodation in the Job Interview: Impact of Interviewer Accent and Gender Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1997; 16(1): 3 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Stamler Toward a Framework for Patient Education: An Analysis of Enablement J Holist Nurs, December 1, 1996; 14(4): 332 - 347. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Burleson, A. W. Kunkel, W. Samter, and K. J. Working Men's and Women's Evaluations of Communication Skills in Personal Relationships: When Sex Differences Make a Difference and when they don't Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, May 1, 1996; 13(2): 201 - 224. [Abstract]