Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunne, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Simultaneous Speech in Small Group Conversation

All-Together-Now and One-at-a-Time?

Michael Dunne

Otago University

Sik Hung Ng

Victoria University of Wellington

From a turn-takingperspective, simultaneous speech in conversation can be an aberration according to the one-speaker-at-a-time norm or a legitimate form of nondisruptive talk according to the all-together-now view. A coding system was devised that identified unambiguous instances of both of these types of simultaneous speech and tested whether the relative distribution of these two types of simultaneous speech varies according to the characteristics of conversation (Experiments 1 and 2) and whether the content of the two types of simultaneous speech differs (Experiment 3). The results from Experiments 1 and 2 confirmed that there are two distinct types of simultaneous speech coexisting in the same conversation and showed that changes in participant familiarity (but not topic orientation) were significantly related to variations in the relative distribution of the two types of simultaneous speech. The results of Experiment 3 showed that the content of the two types of simultaneous speech differs along a supportive (all-together-now simultaneous speech) and unsupportive (one-at-a-time simultaneous speech) dimension.

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, 45-71 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X94131004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
H. Z. Li
Cooperative and Intrusive Interruptions in Inter- and Intracultural Dyadic Discourse
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2001; 20(3): 259 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
S. H. Ng, C. S. F. Loong, A. P. He, J. H. Liu, and A. Weatherall
Communication Correlates of Individualism and Collectivism: Talk Directed at One or more Addressees in Family Conversations
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2000; 19(1): 26 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
S. H. Ng, M. Brooke, and M. Dunne
Interruption and Influence in Discussion Groups
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 1995; 14(4): 369 - 381.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
C. Gallois and J. Pittam
Social Psychological Approaches to Using Natural Language Texts
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1995; 14(1-2): 5 - 17.
[Abstract]


Home page
Language and SpeechHome page
J. Mcallister, A. Potts, K. Mason, and G. Marchant
Word Duration in Monologue and Dialogue Speech
Language and Speech, October 1, 1994; 37(4): 393 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]