Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barker, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 434-461 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X950144006
© 1995 SAGE Publications

Language and Power in an Academic Context

The Effects of Status, Ethnicity, and Sex

Elizabeth S. Jones

Griffith University

Cynthia Gallois

Victor J. Callan

University of Queensland

Michelle Barker

Griffith University

The use of language strategies to express power varies according to the status, sex, and ethnicity of the interactants. A total of 50 same-sex dyads in unconstrained conversation were videotaped: 10 each of Australian student with Australian student, Australian student with ethnic Chinese overseas student, Chinese student with Chinese student, Australian student with Australian academic staff member (lecturer), and Chinese student with Australian lecturer. Results indicated that students shared management of the interaction with other students but that lecturers controlled management of interactions with students. Although both male and female lecturers controlled the discourse, however, men did so particularly with nonverbal behaviour whereas women controlled the interactions with discourse management and interpersonal control. Female students in mixed-status interactions behaved more similarly to males than they did in same-status interactions. Lecturers and male Australian students controlled interactions with Chinese students more than they did with Australian students.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. Leaper and M. M. Ayres
A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 328 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
E. Jones, C. Gallois, V. Callan, and M. Barker
Strategies of Accommodation:: Development of a Coding System for Conversational Interaction
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1999; 18(2): 123 - 151.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
M. Hornsey and C. Gallois
The Impact of Interpersonal and Intergroup Communication Accommodation on Perceptions of Chinese Students in Australia
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 1998; 17(3): 323 - 347.
[Abstract]