This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eisenberg, E. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Flirting with Meaning

University of South Florida

Representational views of language and communication view ambiguity as a problem to be solved. An alternative approach treats ambiguity as an opportunity to challenge, skirt, and reinvent received knowledge and identity. In so doing, this approach makes a connection between epistemology and ontology, linguistic and existential meaning. This article describes this perspective on language and communication and offers three practical examples of how resources of ambiguity can be used to flirt with new, different notions of self and the world.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. K. Barge and G. T. Fairhurst Living Leadership: A Systemic Constructionist Approach Leadership, August 1, 2008; 4(3): 227 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Kuhn and M. H. Jackson Accomplishing Knowledge: A Framework for Investigating Knowing in Organizations Management Communication Quarterly, May 1, 2008; 21(4): 454 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Bavelas Theoretical and Methodological Principles of the Equivocation Project Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1998; 17(2): 183 - 199. [Abstract]

				M. A. Hamilton and P. J. Mineo A Framework for Understanding Equivocation Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 1998; 17(1): 3 - 35. [Abstract]