Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Heywood, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 149-164 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X980172001

Truth, Equivocation Concealment, and Lies in Job Applications and Doctor-Patient Communication

W. P. Robinson

A. Shepherd

University of Bristol

J. Heywood

Cheltenham College of Higher Education

Our concern was to explore two institutional contexts in which telling the truth, equivocating, and lying could each carry costs: applicants not getting a job and doctors coping with distressed patients. For the job interviews, applicants could be truthful, lie, or equivocate about personal qualities specified as necessary in the job description. The chances of detection were varied. The bias was toward truth telling, but in one condition, its incidence dropped to 52%. Lying and equivocation/concealment were preferred equally. For the medical scenarios, stories were varied to match Bok's suggestions about conditions that could encourage doctors not to be truthful. Truth telling was preferred universally. Lying was seen as wrong, as was equivocation. Within these constraints, however, the variances across kinds of patient and outcome were associated with Bok's expectations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Human ValuesHome page
M. N. Wexler
Successful Resume Fraud: Conjectures on the Origins of Amorality in the Workplace
Journal of Human Values, October 1, 2006; 12(2): 137 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
R. Bello and R. Edwards
Interpretations of Messages: The Influence of Various Forms of Equivocation, Face Concerns, and Sex Differences
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2005; 24(2): 160 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
L. L. Winn, H. Giles, and J. J. Bradac
Language, Truth, and Social Reality in the Work of W. Peter Robinson: A Prologue
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2001; 20(1-2): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
P. J. Kalbfleisch
Deceptive Message Intent and Relational Quality
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2001; 20(1-2): 214 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
J. B. Bavelas
Theoretical and Methodological Principles of the Equivocation Project
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1998; 17(2): 183 - 199.
[Abstract]