This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, W. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Language and Social Psychology

An Intersection of Opportunities and Significance

University of Bristol

In the social psychology of language, one recent major development has been an expansion in the types of method considered acceptable for generating and probing descriptions and explanations. Six methodological contrasts are examined, and arguments are advanced both for matching methods to questions and for preferring a multiplicity of them to any exclusive commitment to one. A sketch of the history of research into language use, social class, and education is used to illustrate the academic and sociopolitical consequences of methodological tunnel vision. The example is generalized to questions of whether the development of our societies and subject is to be founded on rational constructions of realities. It is argued that the issue of what are to count as well-founded beliefs depends on the attitudes adopted to the representational function of language and the criteria used to evaluate statements serving this function.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. L. Winn, H. Giles, and J. J. Bradac Language, Truth, and Social Reality in the Work of W. Peter Robinson: A Prologue Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2001; 20(1-2): 5 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]