Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verkuyten, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 3, 302-322 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X9801700302

Attitudes in Public Discourse

Speakers' Own Orientations

Maykel Verkuyten

Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Attitudes are one of the central social psychological topics. They are predominantly studied as individual specific predispositions that determine evaluative reactions to particular objects. Following the work of discursive psychologists, the present study critically examines some core assumptions of attitude theory. The focus is on constructions in public discourse rather than individuals' isolated evaluations of objects in the world. A close-to-the-action analysis of a public discussion about a controversial "erotic" fair is presented, and the definitions and practices of the participants themselves are used as the main ground for determining meaning. It is shown that the participants constructed specific versions of the fair and of themselves in providing a justificatory account of their assessment. Furthermore, it is shown that specific definitions of the attitude object make specific kinds of arguments available.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative ResearchHome page
C. Puchta, J. Potter, and S. Wolff
Repeat receipts: a device for generating visible data in market research focus groups
Qualitative Research, December 1, 2004; 4(3): 285 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
S. Wiggins
Construction and Action in Food Evaluation: Conversational Data
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2001; 20(4): 445 - 463.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
S. A. SPEER and J. POTTER
The Management of Heterosexist Talk: Conversational Resources and Prejudiced Claims
Discourse Society, October 1, 2000; 11(4): 543 - 572.
[Abstract] [PDF]