Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ng, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherall, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 26-45 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X00019001002

Communication Correlates of Individualism and Collectivism

Talk Directed at One or more Addressees in Family Conversations

Sik Hung Ng

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, Sikhung.ng{at}vuw.ac.nz

Cynthia S. F. Loong

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

An Ping He

South China Normal University

James H. Liu

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Ann Weatherall

Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

Conversations in 12 European and 12 Chinese families in New Zealand were recorded and a sample of 15,988 turns of talk was coded under single-and multiaddressee turns. As predicted, the two types of turns varied with cultural individualism/collectivism in both inter-and subcultural comparisons. Single-addressee turns were more common in European (individualistic) than in Chinese (collectivistic) families, and in high (individualistic) than in low (collectivistic) acculturated Chinese families; the reverse was true for multiaddressee turns. The predicted relationship was confirmed by an individual-level comparison: Members of Chinese families who were highly acculturated used more single-and fewer multiaddressee turns when compared with less highly acculturated members. This relationship was unaffected by language (English or Chinese) or age of family members. In a separate analysis of the effect of turn types on turn taking, it was found that multiaddressee turns were associated with more false starts (two or more members started talking simultaneously). Implications of the results for cross-cultural and communication research were discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Marketing EducationHome page
C. L. Brown, K. C. Chan, and P. Lai
Marketing Journal Coauthorships: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthor Behavior
Journal of Marketing Education, April 1, 2006; 28(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Business CommunicationHome page
B. Du-Babcock
An Analysis of Topic Management Strategies and Turn-Taking Behavior in the Hong Kong Bilingual Environment: The Impact of Culture and Language Use
Journal of Business Communication, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 21 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
S. H. Ng and A. He
Code-Switching in Trigenerational Family Conversations among Chinese Immigrants in New Zealand
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2004; 23(1): 28 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]