Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 85-109 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X00019001005

Asian Indian "Self-Suppression" and Self-Disclosure

Enactment and Adaptation of Cultural Identity

Sally O. Hastings

Western Kentucky University

This article studies the cultural influences guiding Asian Indians in deciding whether to express or suppress self-disclosures and self-expressive actions. Philipsen’s definition of ritual is used as a heuristic for examining situations in which overt self-expressions are prohibited or discouraged. The analysis provides a catalyst for reviewing Philipsen’s definition of ritual to include intrapersonal communicative resources that meaningfully reflect and constitute the social realities and the social interactions of participants. Ethnographic interviews with Asian Indian sojourners to the United States are used to examine how, on certain occasions, Asian Indians invoke a culturally meaningful set of thought processes about appropriate role conduct and use a widely intelligible cultural rationale to prompt self-suppression. The findings suggest that this form of communicative conduct adapts to the cultural context by allowing a greater range of disclosures and self-expressive actions and that it guides sojourners’ interpretations of some intercultural encounters.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
T. C. Marshall
Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism--collectivism
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 143 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]