Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pendleton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jaspars, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 17-36 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X8300200102

Communication Difficulties: the Doctor's Perspective

David Pendleton

University of Oxford

Henk Brouwer

University of Amsterdam

Jos Jaspars

University of Oxford

Two studies are reported. In the first study, 24 general practitioners from the Oxford region of England provided information about 950 of their consultations. The aims of the study were threefold. The first aim was to discover the rate at which general practitioners experience communication difficulties in their consultations. This was an attempt to establish the ecological validity of the investigations. The second aim was to explore the doctors' attributions for their difficulties. The third aim was to identify the consultation variables which best predict the incidence of a communication difficulty.

The second study was a full scale replication of the first study in Holland. In this study data were analysed from 28 doctors about 1120 of their consultations. In each study, approximately one in four of the consultations contained some communication difficulty for the doctors. The doctors attributed the difficulties to factors which were external to themselves. The most powerful predictors of communication difficulties were tension in the doctors and perceived tension in the patients. The theoretical, methodological and practical implications of the findings are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
P. M. Smith
Social Psychology and Language: a Taxonomy and Overview
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, January 1, 1983; 2(2-3-4): 163 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]