Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, B.
Right arrow Articles by Durrheim, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 321-338 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X01020003003

The Denial of Racism

The Role of Humor, Personal Experience, and Self-Censorship

Brendon Barnes

Medical Research Council

Ingrid Palmary

Medical Research Council

Kevin Durrheim

Medical Research Council

Informed by discursive psychology, this study aimed to identify and explicate those rhetorical maneuvers that function to introduce the issue of race into conversations in the presence of an interracial couple (the first two authors) in the "new South Africa" and to negotiate "race talk" in their presence while distancing the speaker from inferences of racism. Over a period of 2 months, conversations of people with whom the first two authors came into contact were tape-recorded in a variety of social settings without their knowledge. The study revealed that humor, personal experience, and self-censorship were rhetorical maneuvers drawn on extensively in conversations about race. Two possible reasons for this are suggested. First, the conversations involved the interracial, heterosexual couple and other persons of different races, rather than only White speakers, as in many previous studies. Second, unlike previous studies, conversations occurred in naturalistic settings and not in contrived settings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
D. R. Avery and D. S. Steingard
Achieving Political Trans-Correctness: Integrating Sensitivity and Authenticity in Diversity Management Education
Journal of Management Education, June 1, 2008; 32(3): 269 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse SocietyHome page
D. Every and M. Augoustinos
Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers
Discourse Society, July 1, 2007; 18(4): 411 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
I. Palmary
V. Gender, Nationalism and Ethnic Difference: Feminist Politics and Political Psychology?
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2006; 16(1): 44 - 51.
[PDF]