Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pexman, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Olineck, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 245-274 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X02021003003

Understanding Irony

How Do Stereotypes Cue Speaker Intent?

Penny M. Pexman

University of Calgary

Kara M. Olineck

University of Calgary

Katz and Pexman reported that certain occupations (e.g., comedian) were associated with ironic speech and that participants rated metaphors as more sarcastic when speakers were members of such occupations. In the present research, the authors investigated whether speaker occupation was a cue to ironic intent when the statements were not metaphors (e.g., literal statements such as "you are a wonderful friend, " potentially an ironic insult, and "you are a terrible friend, "potentially an ironic compliment). Results of Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that speaker occupation stereotypes were routinely integrated in the comprehension process but only cued ironic intent when other contextual cues were minimal.Results of Experiment 3 demonstrated that speaker occupation stereotypes involve particular types of information in the context of potentially ironic speech: a speaker’s perceived tendencies to be humorous, to criticize, to be sincere, and also a speaker’s perceived education level.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
M. L. Dress, R. J. Kreuz, K. E. Link, and G. M. Caucci
Regional Variation in the Use of Sarcasm
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2008; 27(1): 71 - 85.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
S. L. Ivanko, P. M. Pexman, and K. M. Olineck
How Sarcastic are You?: Individual Differences and Verbal Irony
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2004; 23(3): 244 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]