Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Palomares, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 210-233 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X03022002004

Language, Gender Salience, and Social Influence

Scott A. Reid

University of California, Santa Barbara

Natasha Keerie

University of Queensland

Nicholas A. Palomares

University of California, Santa Barbara

Reductionist explanations for gender differences in language use continue to occupy much research attention. However, such approaches cannot explain when or why people might change their gender-marked language use. This article reviews and critiques several of these approaches and tests an alternative from the perspective of self-categorization theory. Male-female dyads (N = 42) discussed a gender-neutral controversial issue under conditions of low or high gender salience. When a shared student identity was salient, males and females used tentative language with equal frequency; but when gender was salient, women used more tentative language than men and held the floor longer. Furthermore, women who used more tentative language were more influential with men, but only when student identity was salient. The article suggests that women's tentative language use is influential with men when it serves to unconsciously confirm men's wider, socialstructural advantages over women.

Key Words: social identity • gender • social influence • intergroup


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. Leaper and M. M. Ayres
A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 328 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
A. Hannah and T. Murachver
Gender Preferential Responses to Speech
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2007; 26(3): 274 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
S. J. Ko, C. M. Judd, and I. V. Blair
What the Voice Reveals: Within- and Between-Category Stereotyping on the Basis of Voice
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2006; 32(6): 806 - 819.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
S. A. Reid and H. Giles
Intergroup Relations: Its Linguistic and Communicative Parameters
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2005; 8(3): 211 - 214.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
A. Janssen and T. Murachver
The Role of Gender in New Zealand Literature: Comparisons Across Periods and Styles of Writing
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2004; 23(2): 180 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]