Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Igou, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Bless, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 25-35 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X04273035
© 2005 SAGE Publications

The Conversational Basis for the Dilution Effect

Eric R. Igou

Tilburg University

Herbert Bless

University of Mannheim

The impact of diagnostic information on judgments and in decision making is often reduced when additional, nondiagnostic information is presented. This article argues that the diluting impact of nondiagnostic information results in part from rules of everyday communication,which usually grant relevance to presented information.In an experimental test, participants were presented with positive or negative information about a product.Positive diagnostic information resulted in more favorable judgments than negative diagnostic information. This impact of diagnostic information was diluted when nondiagnostic information was added. Most important, the dilution effect was not observed when the applicability of the conversation was experimentally called into question.

Key Words: dilution effect • diagnosticity • logic of conversation • bias • predictions


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
E. R. Igou and H. Bless
Conversational Expectations as a Basis for Order Effects in Persuasion
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2007; 26(3): 260 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
M. Kemmelmeier
Does the Dilution Effect Have a Conversational Basis?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2007; 26(1): 48 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
E. R. Igou
Additional Thoughts on Conversational and Motivational Sources of the Dilution Effect
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2007; 26(1): 61 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
M. Kemmelmeier
Is Diagnostic Evidence on the Dilution Effect Weakened When Nondiagnostic Objections Are Added? A Response to Igou (2007)
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2007; 26(1): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]