Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to submit your manuscript to SPPS

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blankenship, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Holtgraves, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion

Kevin L. Blankenship

Purdue University

Thomas Holtgraves

Ball State University

This research examined the unique effects of different markers of linguistic powerlessness (hedges, hesitations, and tag questions) on persuasion. Participants read (Experiment 1) or listened to (Experiment 2) a communication advocating comprehensive exams. Under high message relevance, messages containing powerless markers resulted in less favorable attitudes and more negative perceptions of the message and source than did the control message. This effect occurred in both experiments and was a result of these markers lessening the impact of strong arguments; in Experiment 2, strong arguments were no more persuasive than weak arguments when the message contained any of these markers. Under low message relevance, tag questions improved the persuasiveness of message arguments relative to the control condition. These results demonstrate that the effects of linguistic markers of powerlessness are complex and depend on marker type and processing depth.

Key Words: powerless language • persuasion • attitudes

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 3-24 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X04273034


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
J. Mange, N. Lepastourel, and P. Georget
Is Your Language a Social Clue? Lexical Markers and Social Identity
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2009; 28(4): 364 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
A. M. Durik, M. A. Britt, R. Reynolds, and J. Storey
The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments: A Nuanced Analysis of Language
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2008; 27(3): 217 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
T. M. Holtgraves and Y. Kashima
Language, Meaning, and Social Cognition
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 73 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
K. L. Blankenship and T. Y. Craig
Powerless Language Markers and the Correspondence Bias: Attitude Confidence Mediates the Effects of Tag Questions on Attitude Attributions
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2007; 26(1): 28 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Language and Social PsychologyHome page
K. L. Blankenship and T. Y. Craig
Rhetorical Question Use and Resistance to Persuasion: An Attitude Strength Analysis
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2006; 25(2): 111 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]