Journal of Language and Social Psychology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gnisci, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bakeman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 234-259 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X06303474
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Sequential Accommodation of Turn Taking and Turn Length

A Study of Courtroom Interaction

Augusto Gnisci

Second University of Naples, Italy, augusto.gnisci{at}unina2.it

Roger Bakeman

Georgia State University, Atlanta

The broad aim of this research is to show the usefulness of sequential analytic methods when studying courtroom interaction within a communication accommodation theory (CAT) framework. Mutual influences between lawyers and witnesses during courtroom examinations were studied. A previous study examined associations between the content of lawyers' questions and witnesses' answers. In contrast, the present study examines turn taking and turn length, each in relation to the other and both in relation to the content of the interlocutor's previous turn. Using sequential log-linear techniques, this study analyzes 1850 question—answer exchanges from 47 examinations. Results show that lawyers were effective in constraining the quantitative aspects of witnesses' turns and, to a much lesser degree, the content aspects. These and other results are discussed in light of the literature on courtroom speech and of the advantages of using sequential methods when studying CAT strategies.

Key Words: sequential analysis • accommodation • turn taking • turn length • courtroom language • legal interaction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?