This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stern, S. E. Articles by Winters, M. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Positive Prejudice Toward Disabled Persons Using Synthesized Speech

Does the Effect Persist Across Contexts?

University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown, sstern{at}pitt.edu or mullenni{at}pitt.edu.

Muriel Dumont

Catholic University of Louvain and University of Liège, Belgium

John W. Mullennix

University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

M. Lynn Winters

Pennsylvania Highlands Community College, Ebensburg

In general, speech-disabled users of synthetic speech are viewed favorably compared to nondisabled users. The authors examined whether situational variables can affect this favorable view. Participants watched an actor deliver a persuasive appeal under conditions where speech (human vs. synthetic), disability status (unspecified vs. disabled), and situation (unspecified vs. telephone campaign) were varied. Perceptions of argument, message, voice, and speaker were assessed. Overall, synthetic speech was disliked but tolerated more when used by a disabled person. The authors also found that positive prejudice toward disabled speakers persisted when they were engaged in a negatively perceived activity. However, if the disabled speaker used synthetic speech for the negative activity, he or she was viewed negatively compared to a disabled speaker using human speech. Overall, the use of synthetic speech by the disabled does not necessarily damage people's perceptions of them. However, people may express some prejudice when a negative context creates enough ambiguity.

Key Words: augmentative communication • synthetic speech • prejudice • speech disability

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 4, 363-380 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X07307008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Stern Computer-Synthesized Speech and Perceptions of the Social Influence of Disabled Users Journal of Language and Social Psychology, September 1, 2008; 27(3): 254 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]