Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse PSPB online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0261927X08325916v1
28/1/85    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dino, A.
Right arrow Articles by Branscombe, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Online Interactions Between Group Members Who Differ in Status

Amanda Dino

University of Kansas, Lawrence

Stephen Reysen

University of Kansas, Lawrence

Nyla R. Branscombe

University of Kansas, Lawrence, nyla{at}ku.edu

Intragroup interactions between high and low status members on Internet message boards were examined. Messages from low status members to high status members and vice versa were rated for degree of conformity, ingratiation, agreeing, requesting, and instructing. Text was also analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program. Low status member messages were rated as more conforming, ingratiating, and agreeing than high status member messages. Low status members also used more first person singular voice, affective words, and exclamation marks. High status member messages were rated as more instructive than low status member messages. High status member messages contained more complex words, second person references, and welcoming language than did low status member messages. Language use in online contexts clearly differs depending on group member status.

Key Words: intragroup status • conformity • Internet • fans • social identity • peripheral • prototypical

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 85-93 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X08325916
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?