This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0261927X09335256v1 28/3/312    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hoyt, T. Articles by Yeater, E. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Factors Affecting Women's Verbal Immediacy to Sexually Risky Situations

University of New Mexico, timothy.hoyt1{at}us.army.mil

Elizabeth A. Yeater

University of New Mexico

The current study used a word count measure of verbal immediacy to analyze undergraduate women's responses to a set of written vignettes describing hypothetical situations involving sexual risk. Several influences on verbal immediacy were examined, including severity of previous victimization, sexual-risk proximity, relationship intimacy, and response effectiveness. Results revealed that women with a more severe history of victimization evidenced less immediacy in their responses than both women with a less severe or no history of victimization. Responses higher in immediacy were rated as more effective by a group of undergraduate peers. The interaction of risk proximity and relationship intimacy also predicted verbal immediacy. Women responded with greater immediacy to distal risk situations involving nonintimates, and less immediacy to proximal risk situations as well as distal risk situations involving intimates.

Key Words: sexual victimization • verbal immediacy • LIWC

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 312-319 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0261927X09335256


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?