This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0261927X08330614v1 28/2/139    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Iedema, R. Articles by Sorensen, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A New Structure of Attention? Open Disclosure of Adverse Events to Patients and Their Families

¹ University of Technology Sydney
² Queensland Health

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: r.iedema{at}uts.edu.au.

	Abstract

This article presents an inquiry into how clinicians realize a health policy reform initiative called Open Disclosure. Open Disclosure mandates that discussions with patients/family and team staff about "adverse events" are now no longer ad hoc, individualized, and without consequences for how the work is done, but planned, collaborative, and leading to systems change. The article presents an empirical analysis of a corpus of interviews about the impact of Open Disclosure on clinicians’ practices. It situates Open Disclosure in the context of arguments that health care workers are increasingly expected to do "emotional labor" with patients and their families, in that staff are advised to practise "reflexive listening" as a means of managing patients’ and family members’ emotions in response to incidents. The analysis suggests that thanks to the intensity of Open Disclosure interactions, clinicians may be introduced to an affective-interactive space that they were hitherto unaware of and unable to enter or attain what Nigel Thrift calls "a new structure of attention."

First published on January 30, 2009, doi:10.1177/0261927X08330614

Journal of Language and Social Psychology 2009;28:139.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?