This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gibbons, P. Articles by Bradac, J. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Powerful Versus Powerless Language: Consequences for Persuasion, Impression Formation, and Cognitive Response

Jon Busch

James J. Bradac

Department of Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA

Although the literature on the consequences of powerful and power-less language styles for impression formation is extensive, the persuasive effects of power of style have been neglected. Accordingly, a 2 x 2 x 2 experiment was conducted (strong vs. weak argument strength x high vs. low power language x relevant vs. irrelevant topic). Respondents read a message arguing for implementing comprehensive examinations for college seniors which served as a vehicle for the independent variables. Dependent measures consisted of scales assessing persuasion and communicator style/ability. Additionally, cognitive responses were assessed. Dependent measures for persuasion and communicator attributes yielded a three-factor solution: Persuasion, CompetencelControl and Sociability. Further analyses indicated that strong arguments were generally more persuasive than weak ones regardless of relevance, and power of style had no effect upon Persuasion. On the other hand, powerful versus powerless language had a strong effect upon ratings of communicator CompetencelControl and, in conjunction with argument strength, Sociability. Among other things, the cognitive response data indicated that persons were more likely to think about the powerless style than the style that was ostensibly powerful. The results offer little support for Petty and Cacioppo's Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasive effects.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Campbell-Kibler ACCENT, (ING), AND THE SOCIAL LOGIC OF LISTENER PERCEPTIONS American Speech, March 1, 2007; 82(1): 32 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Blankenship and T. Y. Craig Powerless Language Markers and the Correspondence Bias: Attitude Confidence Mediates the Effects of Tag Questions on Attitude Attributions Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2007; 26(1): 28 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Hosman and S. A. Siltanen Powerful and Powerless Language Forms: Their Consequences for Impression Formation, Attributions of Control of Self and Control of Others, Cognitive Responses, and Message Memory Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2006; 25(1): 33 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. L. Blankenship and T. Holtgraves The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2005; 24(1): 3 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Hosman, T. M. Huebner, and S. A. Siltanen The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 2002; 21(4): 361 - 379. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Parton, S. A. Siltanen, L. A. Hosman, and J. Langenderfer Employment Interview Outcomes and Speech Style Effects Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 2002; 21(2): 144 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. B. Whaley and L. S. Wagner Rebuttal Analogy in Persuasive Messages: Communicator Likability and Cognitive Responses Journal of Language and Social Psychology, March 1, 2000; 19(1): 66 - 84. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Holtgraves and B. Lasky Linguistic Power and Persuasion Journal of Language and Social Psychology, June 1, 1999; 18(2): 196 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Thimm, U. Rademacher, and L. Kruse "Power-Related Talk": Control in Verbal Interaction Journal of Language and Social Psychology, December 1, 1995; 14(4): 382 - 407. [Abstract]